麻豆亚洲精品在线播放,午夜在线视频91精品,麻豆视频一区二区,人人干在线观看,99久久精品国产免费,久久视频在线直播

Hi,
訂閱
報(bào)紙
紙質(zhì)報(bào)紙 電子報(bào)紙
手機(jī)訂閱 微商城
英語(yǔ)
學(xué)習(xí)
雙語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí) 熱點(diǎn)翻譯 英語(yǔ)視頻
實(shí)用英語(yǔ) 報(bào)紙聽(tīng)力 TEENS對(duì)話
教育
信息
最新動(dòng)態(tài) 活動(dòng)預(yù)告
備課資源 語(yǔ)言文化
演講
比賽
精彩演講
活動(dòng)動(dòng)態(tài)
用報(bào)
專區(qū)
高中   初中
小學(xué)   畫刊
翻譯頻道 > 熱點(diǎn)翻譯 > 正文
美在阿富汗空襲死者似為平民,五角大樓卻說(shuō):調(diào)查到不了喀布爾
來(lái)源:21英語(yǔ)網(wǎng)    作者:21ST   日期: 2021-09-15
上個(gè)月末,就在最終撤離阿富汗之際,美軍在喀布爾發(fā)動(dòng)了無(wú)人機(jī)空襲,聲稱摧毀了極端組織“伊斯蘭國(guó)”阿富汗分支(ISIS-K)一輛威脅喀布爾機(jī)場(chǎng)安全的汽車。但阿富汗媒體隨后報(bào)道,這起空襲造成包括兒童在內(nèi)的10名平民死亡。(戳這里回顧)

美國(guó)防部:無(wú)法實(shí)地調(diào)查

9月13日,美國(guó)國(guó)防部發(fā)言人稱,美方仍在評(píng)估美軍8月29日在阿富汗首都喀布爾一次空襲的結(jié)果,但無(wú)法派人到喀布爾實(shí)地調(diào)查。

The U.S. Central Command is "still assessing" the results of a drone strike late August in Kabul, Afghanistan, which was alleged to have killed multiple civilians, the Pentagon said on Monday. 
 
美國(guó)國(guó)防部發(fā)言人約翰•柯比13日在記者會(huì)上沒(méi)有就關(guān)于這起空襲的提問(wèn)具體作答。他稱,美方觀點(diǎn)沒(méi)變,即這起空襲是為阻止對(duì)喀布爾機(jī)場(chǎng)迫在眉睫的威脅。“我不能確認(rèn)這起空襲瞄準(zhǔn)的‘伊斯蘭國(guó)’人員身份。”被問(wèn)到空襲所擊中司機(jī)可能是非政府組織雇員時(shí),柯比稱:“我不會(huì)在美國(guó)中央司令部的評(píng)估之前(了解情況)。” “中央司令部正在做評(píng)估,我們需要等他們完成這項(xiàng)工作,”柯比稱,“我不知道有什么辦法能讓調(diào)查人員到喀布爾實(shí)地完成評(píng)估。”

"I would say that the assessment by the Central Command is ongoing, and I'm not going to get ahead of that," Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby told reporters during a briefing. Kirby's remarks were in response to a question over media investigations that suggested the U.S. military might have mistaken an aid worker for a suicide bomber in the Aug. 29 drone strike in Kabul during its military withdrawal from Afghanistan. Kirby defended the assault, saying that it was "taken to prevent an imminent attack." He added that Central Command has so far had no plans to put investigators on the ground, but promised that the Pentagon will be "as transparent about the outcomes as we can."

據(jù)新華社報(bào)道,美國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)卿安東尼•布林肯14日就美國(guó)撤離阿富汗行動(dòng)在國(guó)會(huì)接受眾議院外交關(guān)系委員會(huì)質(zhì)詢?;卮痍P(guān)于上述空襲的提問(wèn)時(shí),布林肯稱:“我知道你說(shuō)的這起無(wú)人機(jī)襲擊,政府中的其他人正在非常非常仔細(xì)地查這件事,以弄清楚到底發(fā)生了什么。”布林肯說(shuō):“我們知道,過(guò)去有平民在(美軍)這類空襲中傷亡。”


9月14日,美國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)卿布林肯在華盛頓出席國(guó)會(huì)聽(tīng)證會(huì)。新華社發(fā)(Pool圖片,德魯•安格雷爾攝)

CNN:死者并非“伊斯蘭國(guó)”阿富汗分支成員

CNN首頁(yè)刊登的報(bào)道則指出:美軍的無(wú)人機(jī)襲擊,造成了為“美國(guó)非政府組織”工作的阿富汗人身亡。

CNN:他們想要在美國(guó)獲得新生,卻被美軍殺死了


報(bào)道稱,43歲的Zamarai Ahmadi在襲擊中身亡。對(duì)美軍而言,美軍擔(dān)心他是“伊斯蘭國(guó)”(ISIS)在阿富汗地區(qū)分支“ISIS-K”的外圍人員,與襲擊喀布爾機(jī)場(chǎng)的陰謀有關(guān);而對(duì)于他的家人和美國(guó)非政府組織的同事而言,他只是去機(jī)場(chǎng)申請(qǐng)美國(guó)簽證,以便帶著全家離開(kāi)塔利班控制的阿富汗。

To the United States military, he was an ISIS-K facilitator they feared was involved in a plot to attack Kabul's international airport. To his family and colleagues at a US NGO, 43-year-old Zamarai Ahmadi was an aid worker applying for a US visa to get his family out of Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.

美軍當(dāng)時(shí)的一份聲明稱,攻擊后發(fā)生了“明顯的二次爆炸”,從而作為車上存在“大量爆炸物”的證據(jù)。一位美方官員還告知CNN,在實(shí)施攻擊前,他們對(duì)車輛追蹤了8個(gè)小時(shí)。

In a statement, US Central Command pointed to "significant secondary explosions" as evidence of a "substantial amount of explosive material" in the vehicle. A US official with knowledge of the operation told CNN Thursday that operatives tracked the car for about eight hours before initiating the strike.


圖源:CNN

然而CNN采訪了兩位爆炸物專家,Ahmadi的數(shù)十位家屬、同事和鄰居質(zhì)疑是否有ISIS相關(guān)人員被殺或者車上存在爆炸物。他們對(duì)軍方行動(dòng)是否有足夠情報(bào)支持表達(dá)了懷疑,因?yàn)樵谛袆?dòng)后有3名持有美國(guó)簽證的成人和7名不足15歲的兒童死亡。

But CNN interviews with two explosive experts and more than two dozen of Ahmadi's relatives, colleagues and neighbors raise questions about whether an ISIS-K facilitator was killed in the attack and whether the car contained explosives. Their accounts also prompt doubts over whether the military had sufficient intelligence to launch a strike that, according to family, would ultimately kill three men with visa pathways to the US and seven children aged 15 and under.

在CNN的報(bào)道中,死者生前所在的非政府組織表示,當(dāng)時(shí)放到車子上的“重包裹”,實(shí)際上是裝滿水的水桶。

圖源:CNN

兩位專家在回看了CNN現(xiàn)場(chǎng)拍攝的大量影像后則認(rèn)為,在無(wú)人機(jī)投擲了“地獄火”導(dǎo)彈引發(fā)爆炸后,沒(méi)有證據(jù)顯示發(fā)生了“明顯的二次爆炸”。

Two experts who reviewed extensive footage filmed on the scene by CNN say the scene is consistent with the aftermath of a Hellfire strike, but both say there is no evidence of one "significant secondary explosion" — let alone multiple blasts.

趙立堅(jiān):必須徹查真相

14日,外交部發(fā)言人趙立堅(jiān)主持例行記者會(huì),有記者對(duì)此事提問(wèn)。

圖源:外交部網(wǎng)站

趙立堅(jiān)表示:近日媒體廣泛報(bào)道美軍在阿富汗誤殺平民,也有國(guó)際輿論呼吁對(duì)美追責(zé)。面對(duì)國(guó)際社會(huì)廣泛質(zhì)疑和一致譴責(zé),美方不能企圖蒙混過(guò)關(guān)、一走了之,必須徹查真相,給阿富汗人民和國(guó)際社會(huì)一個(gè)負(fù)責(zé)任的交代。

There have been a slew of media reports that the US mistakenly killed innocent civilians in Afghanistan and the international public opinion is demanding that the US should be held accountable. In the face of the widespread skepticism and condemnation from the international community, the US should not seek to gloss over its mistake and get away with it. Instead, it should investigate and ascertain the truth and give a responsible explanation to the Afghan people and the international community.

背景閱讀:20年阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)結(jié)束

2001年10月7日,美國(guó)以反恐為名發(fā)動(dòng)阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。去年2月,美國(guó)政府與塔利班簽署協(xié)議,承諾今年5月前撤出阿富汗。今年7月,拜登表示,美軍在阿富汗的軍事任務(wù)將于8月31日結(jié)束。8月15日,塔利班進(jìn)入并控制阿富汗首都喀布爾。美國(guó)緊急組織其公民從喀布爾機(jī)場(chǎng)撤離。大量曾為駐阿美軍和美國(guó)政府機(jī)構(gòu)服務(wù)的阿富汗人涌至機(jī)場(chǎng),要求隨美軍撤離,機(jī)場(chǎng)內(nèi)外陷入混亂。


8月16日,塔利班在阿富汗喀布爾街頭乘車巡邏。新華社發(fā)

8月26日,喀布爾機(jī)場(chǎng)外發(fā)生自殺式炸彈襲擊,至少170名阿富汗平民和13名美軍士兵死亡。“伊斯蘭國(guó)”宣稱制造了這起襲擊。但有幸存者說(shuō),許多平民死傷系由美軍在爆炸發(fā)生后開(kāi)槍造成。美軍8月27日和29日在阿富汗發(fā)動(dòng)無(wú)人機(jī)空襲。美方稱,27日的空襲消滅“伊斯蘭國(guó)”阿富汗分支一名“策劃者”。8月30日晚,一架美軍運(yùn)輸機(jī)載著最后一批美國(guó)軍人離開(kāi)喀布爾,美國(guó)結(jié)束長(zhǎng)達(dá)20年的阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。

綜合來(lái)源:新華網(wǎng),CNN,外交部網(wǎng)站

標(biāo)簽:社會(huì)




 
訂閱更精彩

 主辦
21世紀(jì)報(bào)社版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書面授權(quán),禁止轉(zhuǎn)載或建立鏡像。
主辦單位:中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)社 Copyright by 21st Century English Education Media All Rights Reserved 版權(quán)所有 復(fù)制必究
京ICP備2024066071號(hào)-1   京公網(wǎng)安備 11010502033664號(hào)

關(guān)閉
內(nèi)容